Evaluation of pandemic outside recreation and inexperienced infrastructure in Nordic cities to boost city resilience

0
17

  • Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S. & Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. et al. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 473–502 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T. & Branas, C. C. Urban green space and its impact on human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 445 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesura, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 68, 129–138 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Barton, D. N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, M. A. & McMahon, E. T. Green Infrastructure. Linking Landscapes and Communities (Island Press, 2002).

  • EC (European Commission). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM/2013/0-Green Infrastructure (GI)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital (European Commission, 2013).

  • Haase, D. et al. Greening cities–to be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat Int. 64, 41–48 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Girling, C., Sheppard, S. R. J. & Lu, Y. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 181, 51–79 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. et al. In The Urban Forest. Future City (eds. Pearlmutter et al.) 153–190 (Springer, Cham 2017).

  • Schipperijn, J. et al. Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc. Urban Plan. 95, 130–137 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Zhou, B., Han, L. & Mei, R. The motivation and factors influencing visits to small urban parks in Shanghai, China. Urban For. Urban Green 60, 127086 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn, P. & Stigsdotter, U. A. Landscape planning and stress. Urban For. Urban Green 2, 1–18 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization). Urban Green Spaces and Health—a Review of Evidence (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016).

  • Hegetschweiler, K. T. et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies. Urban For. Urban Green 21, 48–59 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabon, L. Enhancing post-disaster resilience by ‘building back greener’: Evaluating the contribution of nature-based solutions to recovery planning in Futaba County, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Landsc. Urban Plan. 187, 105–118 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S., Emery, M. R. & Hurley, P. T. Depiction of wild food foraging practices in the media: impact of the Great Recession. Soc. Nat. Resour. 31, 977–993 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395, 507–513 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, K., Barthel, S., Colding, J., Macassa, G. & Giusti, M. Urban nature as a source of resilience during social distancing amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3wx5a (2020).

  • Grima, N. et al. The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 15, e0243344 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, B., Kennedy, C., Field, C. & McPhearson, T. Who benefits from urban green spaces during times of crisis? Perception and use of urban green spaces in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban For. Urban Green 65, 127354 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. W., Gladkikh, T. M., Hackenburg, D. M. & Gould, R. K. COVID-19 and human-nature relationships: Vermonters’ activities in nature and associated nonmaterial values during the pandemic. PLoS ONE 15, e0243697 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural England. The People and Nature Survey for England: Key findings for the period April to June 2020 (Experimental Statistics). https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/the-people-and-nature-survey-for-england-adult-data-y1q1-april-june-2020-experimental-statistics (accessed 31 August 31 2022) (2020).

  • Day, B. H. The value of greenspace under pandemic lockdown. Environ. Resour. Econ. (Dordr) 76, 1161–1185 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Bird, N., Hallingberg, B., Phillips, R. & Williams, D. The role of perceived public and private green space in subjective health and wellbeing during and after the first peak of the COVID-19 outbreak. Landsc. Urban Plan. 211, 104092 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metsähallitus. Visitation Numbers. https://www.metsa.fi/en/outdoors/visitor-monitoring-and-impacts/visitation-numbers-and-visitor-profiles/ (accessed 31 August 2022) (2020).

  • Naturstyrelsen. 1 år med corona: Naturen er for alvor flyttet ind i vores liv. https://naturstyrelsen.dk/nyheder/2021/marts/1-aar-med-corona-naturen-er-for-alvor-flyttet-ind-i-vores-liv/ (accessed 31 August 2022) (2021).

  • Venter, Z. S., Barton, D. N., Gundersen, V., Figari, H. & Nowell, M. S. Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214, 104175 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, K., Barthel, S., Giusti, M. & Hartig, T. Visiting nearby natural settings supported wellbeing during Sweden’s “soft-touch” pandemic restrictions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214, 104176 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpilo, S. et al. Coping with crisis: green space use in helsinki before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Sustain. Cities 3, 99 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerholm, N., Eilola, S. & Arki, V. Outdoor recreation and nature’s contribution to well-being in a pandemic situation-Case Turku, Finland. Urban For. Urban Green 64, 127257 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, D., Innes, J., Wu, W. & Wang, G. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis. J. For. Res. (Harbin) 32, 553–567 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouso, S. et al. Contact with blue-green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health. Sci. Total Environ. 756, 143984 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini, F. et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban For. Urban Green 56, 126888 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordh, H. & Olafsson, A. S. Plans for urban green infrastructure in Scandinavia. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 64, 883–904 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., Zulian, G., Guenther, S., Thijssen, M. & Raynal, J. Enhancing Resilience of Urban Ecosystems through Green Infrastructure (EnRoute). JRC115375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2760/689989.

  • ESPON. Policy Brief: Green Infrastructure in Urban Areas. https://www.espon.eu/green-infrastructure-urban-areas (accessed 31 August 2022) (2020).

  • EC (European Commission). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM/2020/3-EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. (European Commission, 2020).

  • O’Brien, K. Is the 1.5 °C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 153–160 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helin, M., Kaukola, A.-K. & Saarinen, S. Turun kansallinen kaupunkipuisto Toimintakertomus 2016-2021 ja toimintasuunnitelma 2022-2024 [Turku National City Park Annual Report 2016-2021 and Action Plan 2022-2024]. https://www.turku.fi/sites/default/files/atoms/files/kkp_turku_toimintakertomus_2016-2020.pdf (accessed 31 August 2022) (2021).

  • Legeby, A. et al. New urban habits in Stockholm following COVID-19. Urban Stud. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211070677 (2022).

  • Stockholm: markkontoret. Stockholms Parkprogram: Handlingsprogrammet 2005-2009 för utveckling och skötsel av Stockholms parker och natur [Stockholm Park Program: Action program 2005-2009 for developing and management of parks and nature in Stockholm]. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjx4NXFvqL4AhU5QfEDHXe5BMYQFnoECBUQAw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmiljobarometern.stockholm.se%2Fcontent%2Fdocs%2Fmp15%2FStockholmsParkprogram2006.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1jEm-rHXt_–trgVPH5jWl (accessed 31 August 2022) (2006).

  • Hansen, A. S., Beery, T., Fredman, P. & Wolf-Watz, D. Outdoor recreation in Sweden during and after the Covid-19 pandemic–management and policy implications. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2029736 (2022).

  • Ranta, M., Silinskas, G. & Wilska, T. A. Young adults’ personal concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland: an issue for social concern. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 40, 1201–1219 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunström, M. et al. Building affordable homes: challenges and solutions in the Nordic Region. Nordregio. Report 2020:2, 1–85 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. & Wang, X. Reexamine the value of urban pocket parks under the impact of the COVID-19. Urban For. Urban Green 64, 127294 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. L. et al. Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol. Infect. 136, 997–1007 (2008).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, T. A., Olafsson, A. S., Bech, N. M., Poulsen, T. S. & Zhao, C. The spatio-temporal development of Copenhagen’s bicycle infrastructure 1912–2013. Geogr. Tidsskr. Dan. J. Geogr. 115, 142–156 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinko, U. et al. Grön Infrastruktur i Urbana Miljöer (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2018).

  • Bay, J.-H. & Lehmann, S. Growing Compact: Urban Form, Density and Sustainability. (Routledge, London, 2017).

  • Jenks, M. & Jones, C. Dimensions of the Sustainable City (Springer, 2010).

  • Alberti, V. et al. The Future of Cities (Publications Office of the European Union, =, 2019).

  • Littke, H. Planning the Green Walkable city: conceptualizing values and conflicts for urban green space strategies in Stockholm. Sustainability 7, 11306–11320 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsinki City Planning Department. Helsinki City Plan: Vision 2050. https://www.hel.fi/hel2/ksv/julkaisut/yos_2013-23_en.pdf (accessed 31 August 2022) (2013).

  • Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M. & Tyger, T. Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Plan. Pract. Res. 31, 195–214 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, K. et al. Residential environments across Denmark have become both denser and greener over 20 years. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 014022 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, C. & van den Bosch, C. K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For. Urban Green 14, 760–771 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, N., Menon, N. & Mannering, F. A statistical assessment of work-from-home participation during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 11, 100441 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badia, A. et al. A take-home message from COVID-19 on urban air pollution reduction through mobility limitations and teleworking. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 1–10 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. B., Hedblom, M., Olafsson, A. S. & Wiström, B. Spatial configurations of urban forest in different landscape and socio-political contexts: identifying patterns for green infrastructure planning. Urban Ecosyst. 20, 379–392 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, M. & Lerstrup, I. In Place, Pedagogy and Play: Participation, Design and Research with Children (eds. Khan, M., Bell, S. & Wood, J.) 194–208 (Routledge, 2020).

  • Copenhagen Municipality. Politik for Udvikling af Københavns Kommunes Fem Kirkegårde mod 2065 [Policy for development of five Copenhagen municipal cemeteries towards 2065]. https://www.kk.dk/sites/default/files/agenda/6ac0a95d-aedc-4d0f-bcc3-8e12f3c9b6ce/dc039835-d6d9-4f5e-baea-10e284507109-bilag-1.pdf (accessed 31 August 2022) (2015).

  • Nordh, H. et al. Similar spaces, different usage: a comparative study on how residents in the capitals of Finland and Denmark use cemeteries as recreational landscapes. Urban For. Urban Green 73, 127598 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigolon, A. & Németh, J. “We’re not in the business of housing:” environmental gentrification and the nonprofitization of green infrastructure projects. Cities 81, 71–80 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duca, J. V., Hoesli, M. & Montezuma, J. The resilience and realignment of house prices in the era of Covid-19. J. Eur. Real Estate Res. 14, 421–431 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, W. & Hamilton, T. Just green enough: contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environ. 17, 1027–1042 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J. & Newell, J. P. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 234–244 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beery, T., Olsson, M. R. & Vitestam, M. Covid-19 and outdoor recreation management: Increased participation, connection to nature, and a look to climate adaptation. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 36, 100457 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, L. & Ison, S. Responsible transport: a post-COVID agenda for transport policy and practice. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 6, 100151 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, H. et al. Perception of safety is a prerequisite for the association between neighbourhood green qualities and physical activity: Results from a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Health Place 45, 124–130 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotswood, E. N. et al. Nature inequity and higher COVID-19 case rates in less-green neighbourhoods in the United States. Nat. Sustain. 4, 1092–1098 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toxopeus, H. et al. How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions? Cities 105, 102839 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Czepkiewicz, M. & Kronenberg, J. Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landsc. Urban Plan. 160, 85–95 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K. & Schipperijn, J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 79, 5–19 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, K. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 16, 67–73 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. A review of sampling effects and response bias in internet participatory mapping (PPGIS/PGIS/VGI). Trans. GIS 21, 39–56 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Præstholm, S. et al. Københavnernes udeliv under Covid-19. [Copenhageners’ outdoor life during Covid-19]. Geogr. Orient. 1, 22–27 (2021).

  • Brown, G. & Kyttä, M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. App. Geogr. 46, 126–136 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poom, A., Järv, O., Zook, M. & Toivonen, T. COVID-19 is spatial: ensuring that mobile Big Data is used for social good. Big Data Soc. 7, 205395172095208 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grêt-Regamey, A. et al. Harnessing sensing systems towards urban sustainability transformation. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 1–9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, C. D. et al. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 161, 32–43 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • ArcGIS. HERE data layers—ArcGIS StreetMap Premium Documentation. https://doc.arcgis.com/en/streetmap-premium/get-started/dd-here-data.htm (accessed 31 August 2022) (2021).

  • Matsuoka, R. H. & Kaplan, R. People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 84, 7–19 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. (Springer-Verlag, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3.

  • Silverman, B. W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. (Chapman and Hall, 1986).