Laundré, JW, Hernández, L. & Altendorf, KB Wolves, Elk, and Bison: Recreating the “Landscape of Fear” in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Allowed to. J Zool. 79, 1401-1409 (2001).
Laundré, JW, Hernandez, L. & Ripple, WJ The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Fear. Open Ecol. J. 3, 1-7 (2010).
Suraci, JP, Clinchy, M., Zanette, LY & Wilmers, CC Fear of humans as apex predators has landscape-wide impacts from mountain lions to mice. Ecol. Latvian. 22, 1578-1586 (2019).
Miller, SG, Knight, RL & Miller, CK Responses of wildlife to pedestrians and dogs. wild society B. 29, 124-132 (2001).
Larson, C., Reed, S., Merenlender, AM & Crooks, KR Effects of recovery on animals shown to be widespread in a global systemic review. PLoS ONE 11, 1-21 (2016).
Balmford, A. et al. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Scale of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biol. 13, 1-6 (2015).
Baker, AD & Leberg, PL Effects of human recreation on carnivores in protected areas. PLoS Biol. 13, 1-21 (2018).
Schulze, K. et al. An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas. Cons Latvian. 11, 1-10 (2018).
Suraci, JP et al. The disorder type and the life history of the species predict the responses of mammals to humans. global Amend Biol. 27, 3718-3731 (2021).
Reilly, ML, Tobler, MW, Sonderegger, DL & Beier, P. Spatial and temporal response of wildlife to recreational activities in the San Francisco Bay ecoregion. biol. preserved 207, 117-126 (2017).
Naidoo, R. & Burton, AC Relative impacts of recreational activities on a temperate terrestrial wildlife assemblage. preserved Science. Practice. 2, e271 (2020).
Nickel, BA, Suraci, JP, Allen, ML & Wilmers, CC Human presence and human footprint have non-equivalent impacts on spatio-temporal habitat use by wildlife. biol. preserved 241, 1-11 (2020).
Blanchet, FG, Cazelles, K. & Gravel, D. Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Latvian. 23, 1050-1063 (2020).
Poggiato, G. et al. On the interpretations of shared modeling in community ecology. TREE 36, 391-401 (2021).
Bates, AE, Primack, RB, Moraga, P. & Duarte, CM The COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Lockdown as a Global Human Confinement Experiment to Study Biodiversity Conservation. biol. preserved 248, 1-6 (2020).
Rutz, C. et al. The COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the impact of human activities on wildlife. nat. Ecol. Development 4, 1156-1159 (2020).
Wang, Y., Allen, M.L. & Wilmers, C.C. Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. biol. preserved 190, 23-33 (2015).
Lewis, JS et al. Human activity affects wildlife populations and activity patterns: implications for spatial and temporal sanctuaries. Ecosphere 12, 1-16 (2021).
Corradini, A. et al. Effects of cumulative outdoor activities on wildlife habitat use. biol. preserved 253, 108818 (2021).
Soule, ME et al. Dynamics of the rapid extinction of chaparral-needy birds on urban habitat islands. preserved biol. 2, 75-92 (1988).
Feit, B., Feit, A. & Letnic, M. Apex predators decouple population dynamics between mesopredators and their prey. Ecosystems 22, 1606–1617 (2019).
Berger, J. Angst, human shields, and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. biol. Latvian. 3, 620-623 (2007).
Sarmento, W., Biel, M. & Berger, J. Redistribution, human shields, and loss of migratory behavior in the crown of the continent. interm. J.Sci. 22, 2016 (2016).
Gaynor, KM, Hojnowski, CE, Carter, NH & Brashares, JS The impact of human disturbance on nocturnal activity in wildlife. Science 360, 1232–1235 (2018).
Microsoft. AI for Earth Camera Trap Image Processing API (2020).
Niedballa, J., Sollmann, R., Courtiol, A. & Wilting, A. camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods Ecol. Development 7, 1457-1462 (2016).
MacKenzie, DI, Nichols, JD, Hines, JE, Knutson, MG & Franklin, AB. Ecology 84, 2200-2207. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3090 (2003).
MacKenzie, DI et al. Occupancy estimation and modeling (Elsevier, 2018).
Fiske, I. & Chandler, R. Untagged: An R-Package for Fitting Hierarchical Models of Wildlife Occurrence and Abundance. J.Stat. Soft. 4, 1-23 (2011).
Mazerolle, MJ AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1 (2020). https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg.
Ladle, A., Steenweg, R., Shepherd, B. & Boyce, MS. The role of human outdoor recreation in shaping patterns of co-occurrence of grizzly bears and black bears. PLoS ONE 13, 1-16 (2018).
Brooks, ME et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility between packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. RJ 9, 378-400 (2017).
Ridout, MS & Linkie, M. Estimating the overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agric. biol. Vicinity. Stat. 14, 322-337 (2009).
Agostinelli, C. & Lund, UR Package ‘circular’: Circular Statistics (Version 0.4-94.1 (2022). https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/.
Santos, F. et al. Prey availability and temporal distribution modulate felid coexistence in Neotropical forests. PLoS ONE 14, 1-23 (2019).
Olea, PP, Iglesias, N. & Mateo-Tomás, P. Temporal resource partitioning mediates vertebrate coexistence at carcasses: the role of competitive and supportive interactions. basic appl. Ecol. 60, 63-75 (2022).
Schilling, F. et al. A respite from US wildlife mortality on roads during the COVID-19 pandemic. biol. preserved 256, 109013 (2021).
Behera, AK et al. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on wildlife in the Deccan Plateau. India. Science. overall environment. 822, 153268 (2022).
Procko, M., Naidoo, R., LeMay, V. & Burton, AC Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdowns. preserved Science. Practice. 4, e12743. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12743 (2022).
Sanderfoot, OV, Kaufman, JD & Gardner, B. Drivers of bird habitat use and backyard bird detection in the Pacific Northwest during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Science. Rep. 12, 12655 (2022).
Nevin, JA & Grace, RC Behavioral Dynamics and the Law of Effect. behavior brain science. 23, 73-90 (2000).
Kautz, TM et al. The response of large carnivores to human road use suggests a landscape of coexistence. global Ecol. preserved 30, e01772 (2021).
Frey, S., Volpe, JP, Heim, NA, Paczkowski, J. & Fisher, JT The transition to nocturnal is not a general trend in predatory species in disturbed landscapes. Oikos 129, 1128-1140 (2020).
Schwartz, CC et al. Contrasting activity patterns of sympatric and allopatric black and grizzly bears. J. Wildl. administer 74, 1628-1638 (2010).
Fortin, JK et al. Effects of human recovery on brown bears (Ursus arctos): a review and a new management tool. PLoS ONE 11, 1-26 (2016).
Kendall, KC et al. Grizzly bear density in Glacier National Park. Montana. J. Wildl. administer 72, 1693-1705 (2008).
Stetz, JB, Kendall, KC & Macleod, AC Black bear density in Glacier National Park, Montana. wild society Bull. 38, 60-70 (2014).
Sargeant, AB & Allen, SH Observed interactions between coyotes and red foxes. J. Mom. 70, 631-633 (1989).
Newsome, TM & Ripple, WJ A continental trophic cascade from wolves to coyotes to foxes. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 49-59 (2015).
Naylor, LM, Wisdom, MJ & Anthony, RG Behavioral responses of North American moose to recreational activities. J. Wildl. administer 73, 328-338 (2009).
Sarmento, WM & Berger, J. Human visits limit the usefulness of protected areas as ecological bases. biol. preserved 212, 316-326 (2017).
Garber, SD & Burger, J. A 20-year study documenting the relationship between turtle declines and human recovery. Ecol. appl. 5, 1151-1162 (1995).
Winter, PL, Selin, S., Cerveny, L. & Bricker, K. Outdoor Recreation, Nature-Based Tourism, and Sustainability. Sustainability 12, 1–12 (2020).
Geffroy, B., Samia, DSM, Bessa, E. & Blumstein, DT How nature-based tourism might increase prey vulnerability to predators. TREE 30, 755-765 (2015).
Eagles, PFJ, McCool, SF & Haynes, CD Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management Vol. 8 (IUCN, 2002).